Tuesday, 24 April 2012

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

I don't normally do good causes, but,  on this occasion I think this one deserves support.  have a look at this,  group of youngsters a chance to represent UK.  http://www.4networking.biz/Forum/ViewTopic/118720

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

TUPE: Substantial Change in Working Conditions


 


If the government were serious about making employment legislation more user friendly, they really should start with the TUPE regs.  but then TUPE is not very sexy or newsworthy is it?  Does'nt really make for a good sound-bite I suppose.  Here, a bus company bought out a bus route, operationally needed to run the vehicles from it's own depot (fair enough!)  ,we can accept that the staff didn't like having to travel further to work, but that doesn't make an automatic "unfair" dismissal !  How was the bus operator supposed to run vehicles from somewhere they didn't own?     Madness! 


My continuing thanks to Daniel Barnett for his excellent updates........www.danielbarnett.co.uk

Thanks to Dr John McMullen of Wrigleys Solicitors LLP for preparing this case summary]

Can a change of location on a TUPE transfer give rise to a claim for constructive, automatically unfair, dismissal?

Yes, says the EAT (Langstaff P) in Abellio London v CentreWest London Buses.

The 5 claimants in this case worked as bus drivers for CentreWest, which ran the 414 bus route operated from its Westbourne Park depot. This location suited the employees' family circumstances, and where they lived. The route was transferred to Abellio. It intended to operate the route from its own depot in Battersea. It was accepted by the parties that this was a service provision change, and therefore a relevant transfer, under Reg 3(1)(b) of TUPE.

The claimants all had objections to the new location. It affected their travel and domestic arrangements. The new location would mean between 1 and 2 hours extra travelling per day. They resigned. It was held by the employment tribunal that there had been a substantial change to the employees' working conditions to their material detriment under Reg 4(9) of TUPE. The move was additionally a repudiatory breach of contract (in that a mobility clause in the employment contract did not extend to the Battersea location). Therefore the employees were also constructively dismissed for the purposes of Reg 4(11) of TUPE. It followed that the dismissals were automatically unfair, being by reason of the transfer.

The EAT agreed, citing with approval the EAT decision on the same point in Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972.


I can help you understand your TUPE risks and exposure,  visit me on   www.pmhrc.co.uk